Another upgrading of the WITs Assessment Criteria by Singapore Productivity Association was released in early Feb or late Jan 2012.
By studying the criteria carefully, team members, facilitators and managers will do well to know how points are allocated.
In my years of consulting, WITs and IQC teams wants to know whether they measure up to other teams. They want to be assessed on how effective their teams’ problem solving methodology compares with the outstanding teams. Agood place to start – the Assessment Criteria.
There are several valuable ideas ‘hidden’ in the criteria. Over the years, teams who regularly participated in the Team Excellence Symposium (or convention, as it used to be known as) actually discover for themselves a whole deeper understanding of the problem solving process.
For instance, one team, I coached begin to appreciate the importance of target setting, and that the target is the anchor for the problem definition. They begin to see that without a ‘firm target’. the problem cannot be defined clearly.
Analysis is really the final stage of the data (evidence) collecting process. Those in the healthcare industry will know that doctors who are good, pay a lot of attention to gathering the historical progression of a disease. For instance, to understand Diabetes better, and to be able to advise the patient on the best treatments available, the doctor will do well to examine a complete history of the patient’s background, type of physical activities he is involved in, his normal diet composition, sugar intake, carbohydrate intake. etc.data is important. Similarly, decisions must be based on sufficient (not complete) and relevant data.
Finally when it comes to implementation, managers of large companies are interested in getting buy-in of the internal stakeholders during the implementation of a nw procedure. If people are not supportive of the solution, whatever change that is being implemented will not be sustainable. How and how much was the buy-in is crucial.
Together with the write-up on the Assessment Criteria (2012), I have also extracted the key focus of each of the ‘items’. While the criteria write-up is a view from the Assessors’ perspective, my objective here is to provide a perspective to help the team members and facilitators view the criteria from their angle.